Several critics are making the precise point just about Death Race that Elizabeth Weitzman makes in the New York Daily News, to wittiness "It knows what it is and doesn't rationalise for it. What it is, incidentally, is junk." That's OK by Kyle Smith of the New York Post , who writes "Nice to know that there is still somewhere to sour for gratuitous violence, fuel-inefficient action and rude one-liners." And Rafer Guzm�n in Newsday remarks " Death Race may be a meretricious, lowbrow piece of pulp, but it's also crackling entertainment -- the very definition of a inexpensive thrill." But David Hiltbrand in the Philadelphia Inquirer asks "What do you get when you boost Roger Corman's 1975 B-movie Death Race 2000? A fried cheeseball." Michael Sragow in the Baltimore Sun dismisses the movie just as "garbage." Critics must love movies like this. It gives them the opportunity to invent new zingers to let fly. Take Roger Ebert's possibility comments in the Chicago Sun-Times "It is an assault on all the senses, including common. Walking out, I had the impression I had exactly seen the video game and was still waiting for the movie." And Peter Hartlaub in the San Francisco Chronicle compares the motion-picture show to the lunch offerings in a school cafeteria "Individual ingredients are recognizable, but the finished product is shapeless glop. While it might be filling, no one with whatsoever taste could possibly call it good."
22/08/2008
More info
